Thread:Roresu/@comment-3142408-20140919041114

"Redirects are Highly Unnecessary"

but why *not* have them. Countless times while getting to know the wikia I typed in 'Michele' or 'SGX' or 'Tree'. Every time I was told there was no content, I'd be confused, then I'd have to run a search and pray I clicked on the right unit from that. If we know what somebody is trying to get to, as they have typed in an extremely common mistype, a JP name, or an abbreviation, why not just send them there. I'm not saying we have to go through and do every single possibility ever, but if somebody says SGX, there is no question they want to be on the 'Duel-SGX' page.

If there is any ambiguity whatsoever a disamguation page would be more helpful than no info whatsoever. Gumi has such weird naming schemes and this wiki has the ability to help cut through some of that muck.

"There will be NO blurbs whatsoever."

This is a rational decision, however the categories in Unit > Unit Groups all have small blurbs describing a bit of common lore surrounding the cluster of units, and some information about how to get them, and what sort of evolutions they have. Can we either remove categories altogether or make it so that all of the RS and Vortex/mock units get one? What prompted me to make these categories was players on the GameFAQs forums using this wikia and being confused because the luther batch (Mad Gods) doesn't have a group in unit categories, but the Guardians do. What is going on there? Its a perfectly reasonable question, and one that I couldn't come up with an answer for.

"Categories are Fan-Made"

We are simply grouping them by the way that Gumi released them, and often Gumi releases a title or salient grouping for the batch such as 'Guardians' or 'Mad Gods'. If you are a new player reading this wiki these fan made titles are going to be everywhere and insanely confusing. I think that purposely overlooking this in the wiki is not that great. If it just doesn't happen, sure, people have other stuff to do. But as far as actively working against it I think that is going a bit far.

re the last point, I'm not saying that it is the same, but everything I am doing is, from where I sit, either a no-brainer (rediects) or preserving consistancy (categories). Also, as soon as he came in and told me to stop I did - I couldn't quite tell what you were trying to get at there, seemed like you thought I was doing something wrong. And the reason I said the thing about carrying the wiki was because it was a fairly accusationary question and I wanted to make sure I he knew it was just a question and I wasn't having a go at him. 