User blog comment:Blake Xi/Why types don't matter/@comment-25944787-20150907001426/@comment-112.210.95.205-20150908052101

^If you read the reply properly, you'd notice why I said it was incongruent.

" It is quite incrongruent to say that a type is prefered but it's not the best, as they both are synonymous to each other."

" To actually describe something as preferable from among a list of things similarly situated, one needs to make an assessment of the advantages and disadvantages one has over the other, the result of which a thing as having more advantages is deemed as superior than the other, hence it is the most prefered, or the best amongst the others similarly situated."

" There is are some inconsistencies with your working definition of the best. From the light of the foregoing, what is the best should be assessed from things similarly situated. But who makes the assessment? The answer is quite simple, the person."