Thread:Agentstrauss/@comment-27462814-20161106142459

I was going to use the Discussion Board for this but it would only have caused further unnecessary drama so I decided against it.I'm requesting a reconsideration of AzureAurelia's one-month ban, which is pretty excessive and unfair imo Giving her a one-month ban for treating a user the exact same way he treats everyone else on the wikia is a bit much, especially seeing as he goes unpunished. She was called 'rude and disrespectful' for not accepting his opinion while the only blatant offence she made towards him was calling him 'kid'. When he doesn't accept someone else's opinion and therefore turns it into an exceedingly long and pointless argument, something I've begun to notice regularly and actually also had the displeasure of experiencing first-hand, why is Azure punished for not accepting his opinions? Ik you guys care about the peace of the wikia, but how come when belittlement of intelligence is so common throughout, and especially from certain other users, Azure is the only one ever reprimanded? There's no consistency tbh. To be clear, I'm not asking for an unban of Azure and a ban of him, but rly just a reduction of Azure's month-long ban. In her ban, 'intimidating behaviour' was mentioned, yet all she rly did was tell him to stop speaking to her otherwise she's treat him how he treats everyone else, bc the argument was so extensive and unnecessary. Don't get me wrong, ik Azure's reputation on the wikia isn't stellar, but considering this situation with someone else who's quite frankly worse atm has consequently resulted in a month-long ban for Azure, this isn't fair, so I can only imagine the ban-sentence has been partially influenced by the moderators' personal dislikes for her.Again, this isn't a request for a ban-lift, but rather at least a somewhat fairer sentence, and further consistency in in how punishments are given out in the future. 