Talk:Valkyrie Archangel Griel/@comment-26297921-20150529121243/@comment-71.123.203.90-20150602194655

People will compare these two because of the BC/HC drops, obviously. However a lot of people are saying Griel will eclipse Feeva and that's only partially true.

Both fill different, and yet similiar, roles. Feeva gives you 70% Atk, Def, Rec boost (eliminating the need for Atro or other boosters) but at the same time will be overwritten by Kanon/Aaron defense buffs or a dedicated Atk+ booster. She also has superior hit count, drop checks, and SBB hits for sparking in comparison to Griel and that alone keeps her a strong contender for a spot on my team. I run Zedus for my Atk/Def down, especially now that his 7* is a a thing that could happen "Soon".

However, Feeva pales in comparison to Griel as a leader and there's no contest there. Like stated just above, she is inferior to Feeva in terms of sparking, hit count, and drop checks which hurts her viability to completely overshadow Feeva as a sub unit. That being said, not everyone has Zedus, Fiora, etc. and her Atk down will be a welcome addition to those teams.

TL;DR - Both are great versatile units that are comparable but fit on different teams. Griel is a better leader, but Feeva is a better sub for some teams -- just depends on what you're working with. I for one feel it's better to have multiple units to do similiar roles than the old style of needing "particular" units to fill metas.