Talk:Inferno Goddess Elza/@comment-71.13.246.204-20150502170122/@comment-25561936-20150510011100

There is no argument here because there is clearly a correct side and clearly an incorrect side. My 'wall of text' is very similar in size to yours. Humour is supposed to be funny, you're using it in a sarcastic way to be condescending, really no other way to view it. Sure, I used directly insulting language because that was in response, as I said stooping to your level. You used indirectly insulting language, really no difference. Maybe you don't like how you sound when people stoop to your level? Who knows. Or perhaps you don't like how people talk to you when you speak to them in a similar way? It doesn't bother me either way :)

"Again, functionality, Quaid's LS is +ATK, BB fill rate, and BB req. reduction, ergo, Quaid's LS values are 100% ATK, 30% fill rate & 20% reduction, which was compared to the LSs of Zurg, Elza & Kuda. Reading comprehension mate."

^ lol wat. I'm sorry, but the way you worded it was an evaluation of the numbers of those units themselves (as you point out in parenthesis) and Quaids. You obviously made an error but are unable to admit to it. At least you just avoided the whole 'spark is best buff' conversation. That would've been awesome, for me.