Board Thread:General/@comment-31952814-20160127142629/@comment-27268294-20160128162246

MaterialType wrote: Exmover wrote: SupportSo far, I believe there are several conditions of being a bureaucrat

1. Active in this wiki (mandatory). Yap has this

2. Experienced wiki forumers; Capable on editing, managing and supervising threads and guides (optional as because bureaucrat points is promotion, demition of the wiki members). Yap also has this

3. Trusted by other active admins/moderators (mandatory). Dunno, only they know this

4. Others members respect the guy, (optional). Dunno, since I'm not really active.

Yet I support Yap for being a bureaucrat. While I can't give explanation of  last two points 1. Being active in this wiki is  not mandatory -_- If he wants to become a bureaucrat it is required

2. Sure he is experienced ,but doesn't mean he is experienced enough...

3-4. Depends on them

So I believe you need to correct 1 and 2.. Just saying It should be mandatory though, since better bureucrat is the "eye" of forum, to see, check and listen whether a person should be promoted/demoted, not just listen. As you're saying it's just required, that is also correct, (just ask the wiki staff after getting admins' recommendation and you will be one). However, it should be noted that Being active is better to be mandatory because if a bureucrat  rare to active, that will make the process and evaluation of promoting/demoting gets to be slower, and even worse, becomes another 'dead' bureucrat.

For the second point, It would be nice if you shows the parameter on how to be experienced.