Thread:Agentstrauss/@comment-27462814-20161106142459/@comment-27462814-20161107023844

I've already read the argument Lin, and I'd like to point out that it began when Azure voiced her opinion (which targeted nobody and was completely fair), and then DeathByStaccato, for some reason, took offence to it. While he didn't make an outright insult towards her, you'd see that the extensive paragraph he wrote out was laced with sarcasm and intended to belittle and mock Azure's opinion directly. Nobody would react well to some random person publicly treating you like an idiot, as he did to her, so she then followed up on it equally in retaliation. She called him a 'child' because he was being childish and demeaning without any valid provocation, and then Staccato decided to remind her of her previous ban, intentionally provoking her further. Why does referring to a childish-acting person as a 'child' result in a ban at all? He obviously seems to take offence to any opinion that doesn't resemble his own, painfully dragging out any possibility of an argument he can for what I assume is just his own satisfaction, which I've noticed myself as well in a similar situation with him. He made sure to chime in on almost every unit-discussion Azure has been a part of recently, so he evidently can't help but want to target her.

Here's a similar instance of an unprovoked deliberate attempt to make another user feel stupid for having their own opinion (Azure again). Doesn't look like he was defending himself to me http://bravefrontierglobal.wikia.com/wiki/Talk:Sakura_Miku/@comment-Frosk123-20161103092345/@comment-DeathByStaccato-20161103102502

I'd provide another link for the page for Bennu Edge Rayla, but honestly he's 'contributed' to it too many times at this point to hone in on one particular comment. He's insulted multiple users here over the course of almost 2 months so if either of you care enough you can just scroll through the comments yourselves. What Azure said to him about his opinion isn't a lot different to "You're 50% correct and 50% dumb" or "....This is why I use Reddit, it actually has smart people" - an example of the inconsistancy I mentioned.

Honestly all Azure did here was respond to a deliberate provocation on DeathByStaccato's part. She stated that she's treat him exactly how he treats everyone else, and that's purely what she did. I find it impossible to see how the way Azure acted warranted a ban while DeathByStaccato is consistantly rude and gets turned the blind-eye. I already know the ban-rules. I know that it begins with a shorter sentence and gradually becomes longer with each ban. I decided to bring it up because I don't think Azure deserved a ban at all, certainly not if Staccato's behaviour doesn't deserve it, but I figured that if you're willing to ban her over this, then you're not just going to lift a ban completely, so I felt that seeing as a ban-lift is impossible it would at least be fairer to meet you halfway and shorten it, regardless of whether a month-ban comes after a 2-week ban.

I don't aim to cause trouble here because being part of the wikia has brought me so much, but I don't like my friends being unjustly banned for inane reasons like this. Obviously I'm getting nowhere though so I'll let this be my last message and then I'll leave it at that. No doubt Staccato will see this while scrolling through recent activity.