Thread:Luxionmk2/@comment-5906087-20150706124550/@comment-24738360-20150706210612

KandD GSE Andy wrote: I only agreed to your permanent ban on one principle Red; the principle was based on the good of the chat.

Think about your ban for a second, and think of the reasons why we agreed to ban you. You have constantly disrupted the chat with your overreactions over the most simple jokes or suggestions. You have repeatedly disrupted the chat by getting into "complex" arguements with a chat member over something so little. Your two bans had nothing to do with personal bias towards you from Bre/Blake, it had to do with your disruptive behaviour in the chat. I strongly believe that your ban is justified, since your personality seems to reflect a negative tone onto the chat.

As Yap said eariler, you have broken many rules, by overreacting or harrassing. For example, you have shown a strong hatred for Bre/Blake since he had banned you twice for good reasons. Most people would have accepted the TEMPORARY 1 or 3 DAY BAN, but you decided to overreact by creating a thread in which you bashed Bre/Blake as a Mod. You insulted Bre's/Blake's role as a Mod, since you believed that he was a "bad mod". You had trolled many people over the chat with your strong affection towards units like Mimir or Alice. ''WRITING LOVE LETTERS DOES NOT HELP INCREASE SUMMONING RATES. ''Red, this is a light-hearted chat, so of course people will make jokes and such. You don't need to overreact over these jokes, as I for one am a person who is joked around with in the chat. I don't mind those joes, such as "Lel Andy is a pleb" or "Andy is a nub" Since they're tru..... Er... Since they are jokes. I have no idea about these harrassments in PM that you had sent someone, but if you had harrassed a user over PM, then that is one serious offense.

If you somehow are abe to change, so you can actually chat without causing any problems, then we may consider lifting your ban. Until that day, you have to accept the ban.

-Andy